I see it was also repeated on some other idiot site - an outfit called "monstrous" which appears to be a Pommy site.
I note that the aptly-named "Miss Prozac" blocked comments on her blog, ensuring I was unable to publicly answer her. Accordingly, this should cover the situation:
Miss Prozac.
Yet again, I'm overcome with the irony of you feebly attempting to attack my credibility while you yourself hide behind a pseudonym. Unlike you with my details, I have no need to reveal your real name - not that I'd hid mine in any way, as you found by doing the simplest search on the internet; a "whois" query.
I find it outstandingly appropriate that an anonymous gorgon would attack my credibility. You are prepared to support a complete fantasy - psychics - while questioning something which is physically demonstrable, and even attempting to belittle Charman Charity. What kind of sad-arse behaves like that?
I note with great distaste that you even go as far as naming my wife and our employees in your blog, despite them having nothing whatsoever to do with the challenge, but that's how you operate, c'est la vie. I do thank you for revealing your true colours in this most emphatic way.
Anyway, Prozie - the offer stands. All the psychics need do to confirm the existence of the $2m prize is to apply. I'm not about to satisfy your curiosity just for the sake of keeping a two-bit blogger happy. You've shown your lack of guts by blocking replies on your blog and you've shown that you will support outright frauds while putting down an industry which employs thousands of NZ families - the thoroughbred racing industry. Please do note that NZ's chief justice is but one of many well-known racehorse owners while you try to label it as some poor cousin.
This from a "reality tv" blogger incapable of even using a real name!
Just so that you know, there are still plenty of pragmatic types in the world who are keen to put their money where their mouths are - exactly the opposite of these fraudulent psychics.
________________________
Prozac and her "reality" tv blog are exactly typical of the mindset of people who support idiocy like psychics.
I like to call a spade a spade and bullshit bullshit. But people often question the vitriol I use against psychics.
Ever wonder, "What's the Harm?"
Quod erat demonstrandum.
As to Prozie's worries about posting on a racing site, anyone can have their say right here - not that I expect any of them to. Expecting any kind of honesty from cheats and liars is probably a little too hopeful, even for me. And you can be anonymous - an important choice.
Today's mail - 12 August 2008
I think you're just frustrated at the fact you
dont have a clue which is ok i wont hold it against you
but there is some pretty over welming stuff in sensing
murder to totally write it off is a bit arrogant but
shows you are frustrated and confused which is fair
enough it is out there. And me wrtting this email is
making you more frustrated you're a very sad person and i
feel sorry for you. I'm sorry you have no belive
Up you're bum and around the corner
Yep, that is a real comment posted here; that's why anonymity is important.
Marvellous stuff!
2 Sept 2008 - here's another pair of dicks! Check these winners out:
Anonymous, of course.....
i say if u hate sensing murder u r bullsit ur self
Genius! That's a riposte to make me change my ways.
and....
i belive that sensing murder is real how would
they get the infomation about the victims they are
supervised so they cannot google the case thank you
Oh my god, you poor fucking sap. They don't need to Google it - Ninox has a former police officer working for the program. Ninox is a media company, and they have access to excellent media history. So far, not one single piece of evidence has been found which wasn't already known to the police!
Don't you think it's just amazing that these wonder psychics can only come up with stuff the cops already know?
No, you clearly don't, or you wouldn't have written such an amazingly ignorant e mail. Are you a congenital idiot? Ninox makes bloody well sure that the psychics have access to all the information, and if you believe that David Baldock isn't lying when he gives his wank "I don't know how they know this stuff", then you are indeed dumb enough to be living in a halfway house somewhere.
Please, is there at least a semi-literate person who wants to stick up for this shite?
Answer to date is clearly a resounding "NO"!
Yet, I do get the odd lucid e mail. Try this one for size:
As a 'devout' skeptic, I too was amazed at the ability of the psychics on Sensing Murder when it first came on the screen.
However, rather than accept what I saw as fact, I thought about it, and did some research on the internet, sites put there by those who are more skilled than myself at spotting fraud.
By looking at a number of skeptical web pages, I soon realised how the deception is done.
I believe that 'extraordinary claims such as sensing murder require extraordinary evidence'. There is NO evidence on Sensing murder except for the word of the program's producers.
Give me a rational explanation anytime. Do supporters
of the program realise what grief is caused by families and loved ones of the
murdered or missing?
No, mate, they do not. Or if they do, they don't give a shit.
Amazing how easy it is to pick people whose brains actually work. This correspondent is clearly one of them - look at the facts, make a decision.
Well played!
(and guess what? The comment isn't anonymous - I have withheld the name and address as it's private information and we respect privacy, unlike certain realitytv blogs.....